Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice
This article argues that strict voter ID laws are typically unnecessary, unconstitutional, and impose arbitrary burdens on equal access to the right to vote. This article will examine the photo the burdens some states impose through voter ID laws in violation of the United States Constitution's equal protection principle. Part I evaluates voter identification requirements that supposedly combat voter fraud absent any credible evidence that in-person voter fraud is common. Part II evaluates constitutional challenges to voter identification laws after the Supreme Court's 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision. Part III shares the view that President Trump's election integrity commission was intended to serve as a tool for voter suppression. This article concludes that the Supreme Court's decision in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board was wrongly decided because by declaring strict voter ID laws constitutional, it enabled the states to deny low-income minority voters access to the ballot in violation of the rationale of Harper.
Voting rights, Voter ID laws
Civil Rights and Discrimination | Constitutional Law | Election Law
Weeden, L. Darnell, "Unreasonably Restrictive Voter Photo Identification Requirements Are Unequal Economic Barriers to Equal Access to the Right to Vote" (2018). Civil Rights Publications. 10.
University of Southern California Gould School of Law